Matej Maruscak vs Mateo Faber Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maruscak vs Faber analysis and find out who is favored!
Matej Maruscak vs Mateo Faber Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Maruscak 1 - 0 Faber
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maruscak has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Faber has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maruscak, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Faber has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maruscak has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Faber has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maruscak has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Faber winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maruscak has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5). Faber has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 41/ 61).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maruscak winning 1 times and Faber being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Maruscak winning 2 and Faber winning 0. The last match between Maruscak and Faber was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F2, 16-05-2016, Q3, Clay with Matej Maruscak getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Maruscak and Faber have played a deciding set 0 times, with Maruscak winning 0 times and Faber 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Maruscak winning 0, and Faber 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maruscak has played against opponents with an average rank of while Faber has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maruscak has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Faber has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maruscak has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Faber has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Matej Maruscak
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
L
Plays
Mateo Faber
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
60% (103-69)
Career Total W/L
43% (69-90)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matej Maruscak | Mateo Faber |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matej Maruscak | Mateo Faber |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matej Maruscak Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 0-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Matej Maruscak
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matej Maruscak
Player
Andrej Glvac
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ken Onishi
Player
Matej Maruscak
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matej Maruscak
Player
Maxim Krapivin
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
8
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Mateo Faber Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Wilson Leite
Player
Mateo Faber
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
10
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
53 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alessandro Luisi
Player
Mateo Faber
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more